frankj, I'm not sure you should dismiss diet changes so quickly.
I was diagnosed with elevated blood pressure (150/90) 30 years ago, when I was in my late 30's. Doc then gave me a routine treadmill stress test and wanted to put me on pills, but relented when I promised to mend my ways.
At the time, Jim Fixx had just died an early death, and Nathan Pritiken was preaching the benefits of a low fat (total calories from fat < 5%) diet for treating hypertension. While I never attained that low level, I did make major changes in my diet, which had been the typical American diet (fat > 40% of total calories). And altho it took more than a decade, my BP started to come down...last month it was measured at 120/65.
Now that I'm approaching 70 I'm aware that there may be other dietary concerns than just fat. I was very influenced by a lengthy NYTimes article last January about the American diet entitled
Unhappy Meals. Author Michael Pollan claimed that the reason civilized man always ate so much carbohydrate was only for merchantile reasons: grain could be easily stored and traded, which fresh food, such as spinach could not. But a grain-centered diet is not good for you: are you a steer out on a Colorado feed lot being fattened for slaughter? I believe Dr Barry Sears'
Zone Diet probably comes closest to answering Pollan's concerns.
So I've begun to regard all food as a drug. And recently my diet has been mainly leaves and canned salmon. No sugars, no carbohydrates, limited fats. Not the most thrilling diet. But I feel much better. And my doc says my health recently has improved markedly...in ways that only another old guy could appreciate.