Register | Login
Attackpoint - performance and training tools for orienteering athletes

Discussion: Good work!

in: Bomb; Bomb > 2019-10-27

Oct 27, 2019 11:53 PM # 
jennycas:
I don't envy anyone trying to come up with a resolution for that situation...
(surprising that IOF hadn't pre-identified the jury's members though?)
Advertisement  
Oct 28, 2019 6:56 AM # 
Bomb:
I wish the iof would hurry up and post the decision. I know it still won't please everyone but the lack of information is contributing to a lot of extra drama here.
Oct 28, 2019 7:01 AM # 
Bomb:
A few potential jurors had major conflicts of interest, others couldn't be find and there seemed to be a strong preference to not have orienteering politicians make the decision.
Oct 28, 2019 7:57 AM # 
Uncle JiM:
https://eventor.orienteering.org/Documents/Event/3...
Oct 28, 2019 8:16 AM # 
jennycas:
Out of interest, did anyone reference Tim Robertson's disqualification in the WOC long in Estonia where he apparently went through the corner of an area marked OOB on the map but which was not clearly defined on the ground, right towards the end of the race?
Oct 28, 2019 9:44 AM # 
Bomb:
No. We didn't consider any other races as precedents and we wanted to make it clear that this decision did not constitute a precedent in relation to crossing oob.
Oct 28, 2019 10:57 PM # 
jennycas:
Fair enough - they were lucky to have you as someone who had actually experienced the map/terrain/course at race pace.

At EA/controller workshops we always end up using previous precedents as jury examples though...
Oct 29, 2019 12:28 AM # 
Bomb:
I think the process as a whole will be a useful example to discuss but it's important not to pick and choose specific things from it to use as a precedent in a different situation.

Please login to add a message.