in: j-man; j-man > 2006-11-05;
| # Posted 2006-11-07 09:39:22 | |
| Swampfox: | I can not make the claim that it was kind of hard to figure out the story behind the undisclosed places and unidentified people. Now some agents begin cross referencing their AP entries and next thing we know that a name change will happen, but I didn't say this either. A mystery person might have, however.
As I refused to disclose yesterday in my AP entry, an unindentified person was observed dragging the whole state of Texas behind his truck, and it was really big. Some jeep trails look badly battered. I have not figured out if the new New York will be surmounted in Virginia, top out at Washington D.C. or as a vestigial Republican outpost floating in the Atlantic on the coast of Maryland. All will not be revealed at the Batona 499 or any other locale. |
| # Posted 2006-11-07 18:06:22 | |
| j-man: | Not nice. You are going to be causing a disruption in the blogoshpere with this inscrutable missive. (On a related note, who wants to speculate as to how long that word remains in the lexicon? I've enver used it before now, and I hope to never do so again. Look at what this confoundingly counfounding posting is doing to people already.)
Balter? |
| # Posted 2006-11-07 19:25:04 | |
| Swampfox: | Your word is blogoshpere, pronounced to rhyme with "oh, my gosh, pierre!", perhaps something a lass named Marie would utter in a moment of passion?
Or did you mean another word, like missive, formed as a truncation of "dismissive", and meaning the opposite? These are worthy issues for a Man of the Fed to be pondering. But Balter would be able to cut to the heart of the matter immediately, wasting no time, and able to turn full attention back to the various delicate decisions required on a daily (hourly) basis by any import/export business. |
| # Posted 2006-11-07 20:46:54 | |
| j-man: | The problem with his "business" is that it devolved into a cult of the celebrity CEO, blinding him to the rough seas that now threaten to swamp the entire enterprise. |
| # Posted 2006-11-07 20:54:45 | |
| Swampfox: | The seductive glare of the celebrity spotlight will almost always succeed in snaring even the most exceptional of Ordinary Man. What chance did B ever have against the Costcos and other beheamoths anyway, realistically? But can it really be true that the entire enterprise is now slipping away on an ebbing tide, with the prize just out of grasp? Information has been scant, and even that little bit was only obtained with exceptional difficulty. |
| # Posted 2006-11-07 20:58:10 | |
| j-man: | What we really need is someone undercover. I would never make it by security, being a representative of The Man. You, maybe, but it is hazardous duty, and you have a country to look after.
Honestly, I think Eddie is the only one who may be equipped to succeed. We need Eddie. Eddie!!! |
| # Posted 2006-11-07 21:09:17 | |
| speedy: | He is already undercover. |
| # Posted 2006-11-08 09:15:07 | |
| Wyatt: | For example, you see this posting from "speedy", but due to various name changes, that was eddie, but not any more. |
| # Posted 2006-11-08 21:06:11 | |
| Swampfox: | "The Burn" has spoken. All is now determinate. Outlying asymptotes and various miscreants may be, by choice, either discarded, discredited, dismissed, or disregarded. |
| # Posted 2006-11-08 21:14:34 | |
| j-man: | To say nothing of baltered. |
You must be logged in to add a message