# Discussion: Leg distances

Jan 2, 2007 12:36 PM
Does anybody know the leg distances? I want to know what my minutes/kilo were.
Jan 3, 2007 2:13 AM
working on leg lengths now
Jan 3, 2007 2:29 AM
The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:

Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot).

Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been.

Forked legs:
4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390
4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430
9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670
9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550

Likely skips
Jan 3, 2007 2:29 AM
The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:

Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot).

Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been.

Forked legs:
4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390
4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430
9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670
9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550

Likely skips
Jan 3, 2007 2:29 AM
The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:

Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot).

Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been.

Forked legs:
4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390
4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430
9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670
9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550

Likely skips
Jan 3, 2007 2:29 AM
The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:

Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot).

Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been.

Forked legs:
4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390
4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430
9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670
9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550

Likely skips
Jan 3, 2007 2:29 AM
The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:

Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot).

Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been.

Forked legs:
4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390
4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430
9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670
9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550

Likely skips
Jan 3, 2007 2:32 AM
The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:

Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot).

Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been.

Leg 7-8 and 8-9 distances were not adjusted, although the control was actually placed 50 meters south of where it should have been (closer to 7, farther from 8).

Forked legs:
4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390
4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430
9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670
9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550

Likely skips:
skip 7, go 6 - 8 700
skip 9, go 8 - 10B 400