in: OCIN New Year's Orienteering Festival: Piglet;
| # Posted 2007-01-02 17:36:03 | |
| Adam: | Does anybody know the leg distances? I want to know what my minutes/kilo were. |
| # Posted 2007-01-03 07:13:49 | |
| mikeminium: | working on leg lengths now |
| # Posted 2007-01-03 07:29:15 | |
| mikeminium: | The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:
Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot). Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been. Forked legs: 4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390 4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430 9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670 9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550 Likely skips |
| # Posted 2007-01-03 07:29:18 | |
| mikeminium: | The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:
Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot). Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been. Forked legs: 4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390 4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430 9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670 9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550 Likely skips |
| # Posted 2007-01-03 07:29:20 | |
| mikeminium: | The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:
Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot). Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been. Forked legs: 4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390 4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430 9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670 9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550 Likely skips |
| # Posted 2007-01-03 07:29:21 | |
| mikeminium: | The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:
Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot). Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been. Forked legs: 4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390 4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430 9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670 9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550 Likely skips |
| # Posted 2007-01-03 07:29:21 | |
| mikeminium: | The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:
Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot). Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been. Forked legs: 4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390 4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430 9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670 9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550 Likely skips |
| # Posted 2007-01-03 07:32:01 | |
| mikeminium: | The leg lengths shown have a couple issues:
Leg from start to 1 and 16 to finish both measure to where the start and finish actually were, not where the triangle was on the map (due to wet & cold, start and finish were in front of teh lodge instead of on the outer edge of the parking lot). Leg from 2 to 3 is based on where 3 was actually placed, and assumes a straight line from 2 to where 3 was mapped (400m), then a right angle turn for 140 m to where 3 was actually placed. I think this reflects what most of the pack actually did, not including some wandering around where 3 should have been. Likewise, the leg from 3 to 4 was in reality only 90 meters instead of the 230 from where 3 should have been. Leg 7-8 and 8-9 distances were not adjusted, although the control was actually placed 50 meters south of where it should have been (closer to 7, farther from 8). Forked legs: 4 - 5A 190; 5A - 6 390 4 - 5B 200; 5B - 6 430 9 - 10A 260; 10A - 11 670 9 - 10B 320; 10B - 11 550 Likely skips: skip 7, go 6 - 8 700 skip 9, go 8 - 10B 400 |
You must be logged in to add a message