Register | Login
Attackpoint - performance and training tools for orienteering athletes

Discussion: not a pit but depression

in: DVOA Fall Orienteering Festival (Nov 16–17, 2013 - Elverson, PA, US)

Nov 23, 2013 10:47 PM # 
One thing I wanted to ask the mapper of French Creek: I noticed these two pits pretty close to each other, but then later noted that the southern one was mapped as a depression. Is there a reason for that? maybe a pit cannot be wider than an a specified length?
Nov 24, 2013 3:57 AM # 
Based on passing them twice on Blue, I think the southern one was larger - presumably large enough to be represented by a clear (and shaped) contour line - vs. the other, which was presumably too small to allow that, and thus a V was chosen. Just a guess.
Nov 24, 2013 8:45 AM # 
If you were unhappy when you passed it, then it was a depression.
Nov 24, 2013 2:21 PM # 
And if you were pissed off, then it was "the pits". Right or wrong, it always seems to boil down to mapper's discretion/experience/ability. Make your own map, make your own version of pits & depressions & lots more! (ISOM aside of course:).
Nov 24, 2013 4:06 PM # 
I don't know if I am "the" mapper in question, but I was the original field checker, and these features haven't changed, passing through eyes two other top level (int'l or WOC level) mappers. My memory hasn't been refreshed with a recent visit, but I think Wyatt gives the basic answer, one hole is significantly larger than the other, and deemed large enough to be shown with a contour, which is almost always the first and simplest option.

My nit picking complaint with both the original and current version of this depression, is that they are both drawn with two sub standard slope tags, rather than one proper slope tag which would more clearly distinguish it from a knoll. (I was not the draftsman or editor of either version)

This discussion thread is closed.