median leg score: 106.2
calculated time lost: 1:07 (+1.4%)
split | cumulative total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | dist | time | place | delta | score | lost* | pace | dist | time | place | delta | pace | comments | |||||||||||||||||||||
1. | 178m | 1:05 | 2 | +7 | 12% | 97.9 | 6:05 | 178m | 1:05 | 2 | +7 | 12% | 6:05 | I plan to post the route. | ||||||||||||||||||||
2. | 609m | 4:31 | 1 | -11 | -4% | 109.7 | 7:24 | 787m | 5:36 | 1 | -4 | -1% | 7:06 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3. | 413m | 3:56 | 3 | +19 | 9% | 96.3 | 9:31 | 1200m | 9:32 | 2 | +3 | 1% | 7:56 | I got stuck in the darn fence, that's why so slow. | ||||||||||||||||||||
4. | 915m | 6:13 | 2 | +5 | 1% | 106.2 | 6:47 | 2115m | 15:45 | 2 | +8 | 1% | 7:26 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5. | 370m | 4:05 | 1 | -13 | -5% | 107.8 | 11:02 | 2485m | 19:50 | 1 | -5 | 0% | 7:58 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6. | 356m | 3:31 | 2 | +7 | 3% | 100.8 | 9:52 | 2841m | 23:21 | 2 | +2 | 0% | 8:13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7. | 568m | 5:27 | 1 | -15 | -4% | 103.3 | 9:35 | 3409m | 28:48 | 1 | -20 | -1% | 8:26 | I went wide right, staying on the N–S road until the power line, then ran the ridgeline. I had serious doubts about the route, especially since Swisschocolate had in essence said in his notes that the trail/road was almost never faster, but splits show it worked out just fine. I think the control was half a contour too high. | ||||||||||||||||||||
8. | 618m | 4:09 | 1 | -28 | -10% | 111.5 | 6:42 | 4027m | 32:57 | 1 | -48 | -2% | 8:10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
9. | 322m | 2:22 | 1 | -30 | -17% | 119.5 | 7:20 | 4349m | 35:19 | 1 | -1:18 | -4% | 8:07 | |||||||||||||||||||||
10. | 78m | 30 | 2 | +1 | 3% | 106.7 | 6:24 | 4427m | 35:49 | 1 | -1:17 | -3% | 8:05 | |||||||||||||||||||||
11. | 1024m | 10:31 | 2 | +1:54 | 22% | 94.8 | 1:50 | 1:07 | 10:16 | 5451m | 46:20 | 2 | +37 | 1% | 8:29 | From the onset, I went too wide to the left, then hit the road and ended up on an S-curve. Which, as the textbook says, is rarely the fastest. I am curious as to which route Ted took for his blazing split; I wonder if all the way around to the right, staying high, was the fastest. | ||||||||||||||||||
12. | 444m | 4:16 | 1 | -11 | -4% | 104.2 | 9:36 | 5895m | 50:36 | 2 | +16 | 1% | 8:35 | It took a long time to get down to the lake just after #11. | ||||||||||||||||||||
13. | 670m | 6:13 | 1 | -40 | -10% | 108.3 | 9:16 | 6565m | 56:49 | 1 | -24 | -1% | 8:39 | I ended up going less straight than I wanted to, mainly because the woods just S of the large field were junky (mapped as white). | ||||||||||||||||||||
14. | 290m | 2:58 | 2 | +11 | 7% | 102.2 | 10:13 | 6855m | 59:47 | 1 | -13 | 0% | 8:43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
15. | 590m | 4:30 | 1 | -26 | -9% | 107.2 | 7:37 | 7445m | 1:04:17 | 1 | -45 | -1% | 8:38 | Another leg on which I was not sure whether my grossly simplified route (trail all the way) was the best. It was. After the race, I saw the shorter route that included the ride on the S side of the large reentrant. I do not know if anyone took it. | ||||||||||||||||||||
16. | 416m | 3:41 | 1 | -31 | -12% | 111.5 | 8:51 | 7861m | 1:07:58 | 1 | -1:16 | -2% | 8:38 | I took a really bad fall crossing the fence just before #16, probably tripping on said fence. Larry Vidinha heard what I said, and seemed unhappy about the disturbed peace. | ||||||||||||||||||||
17. | 430m | 3:50 | 1 | -20 | -8% | 111.7 | 8:54 | 8291m | 1:11:48 | 1 | -1:36 | -2% | 8:39 | |||||||||||||||||||||
18. | 707m | 6:03 | 2 | +15 | 4% | 99.9 | 8:33 | 8998m | 1:17:51 | 1 | -1:21 | -2% | 8:39 | I went wide left, using as much of the trail as I could. I don't think this was particularly bad, I was just slow going downhill, afraid to trip and fall again. | ||||||||||||||||||||
19. | 143m | 34 | 3 | +7 | 26% | 89.2 | 3:57 | 9141m | 1:18:25 | 1 | -1:14 | -2% | 8:34 |
* red = reported, gray = calculated