Kent's system is great and we've used it plenty of of times, but my understanding - correct if wrong! - is that he's not interested in spending that much time developing or customizing it further or writing extensions (or APIs) to talk with a national epunch database and/or membership database. Nor is it well suited for local meets with lots of first-timers, Boy Scouts, teams, school groups, families, etc.
For some non-A meets (example: our recent MTBO), we've also used Active.com, and recently thought about switching to
imathlete. It's way easier on a club's IT volunteers! But they have limitations too.
Is there good data on the costs (staff + $) and benefits of independent vs integrated national epunch +/- membership +/- national & local registration systems? Or perhaps even subjective opinions?