Seems like Daved_Waller has it essentially correct?
Orienteering is a competitive, four-dimensional sport. It takes in the
three dimensions of movement (forward, lateral, and climbing) plus the fourth
dimension, TIME.
and from the
COF newsletter where that was found....
If any one of these dimensions is lacking, it becomes
Something else, not orienteering. If time is lacking, it becomes a non-
competitive exercise of simply "getting somewhere". If the need for climbing
or avoidance of obstacles such as hills, marshes etc„ - is lacking, it becomes
cross-country running, not orienteering. The essential ingredients of the sport
are that each of these dimensions has to be present, has to be a variable to some
degree determined by the individual, and it has to be competitive, THEN it is
orienteering. Other than that, it is exercise only. Orienteering is a complete
and separate type of sport experience and to maintain the excellence of this
experience, course setters should ensure that each of their courses is not just a
cross country run for their harriers'(they can do that in'their own races) not
a "240° north for 80 steps and 127° East for 200 steps" '(parking Lot problem)
nor just exercise competitive or not.. Each and every one of the courses should
include the four dimensions of the sport related to the skill of the competitors.
When properly balanced, the problems presented by the composition of those four dimensions make the sport a truly exhilarating and immensely rewarding experience for all its participants.