Note
Didn't feel like a run today, so I didn't. :-)
But I did manage two other accomplishments that I would normally have thought beyond me. The first was changing a headlight in my Subaru this morning. Yes, I have done it before, but it is still quite a miracle that I actually did it again, since memory of prior changes in pretty much non-existent.
And the second was another technical/mechanical feat that I do more frequently this time of year, perhaps every two to three weeks, and that is replace the toner cartridge in my printer. So I should get good at this, and I think I am, but it is not due to any help from the instructions, which in the last couple of years have been diminished from reasonably easy to understand large-scale illustrations on paper to little pictograms molded into the side of the toner cartridge. But it saves a few cents on each cartridge, and that's the way the world works.
Regardless, on an otherwise rather stressful day with less progress than I would like, these were a couple of moments worth celebrating.... :-)
=================
More on the GPS issue....
I think it is a useful exercise to imagine that you were actually the person to decide what OUSA's policy should be regarding GPS devices. What would you decide?
First, I would suggest that the following things should be considered --
1. A ban could cover no events or all events or something in between.
2. A ban could cover some classes or all classes, and this could vary depending on the event.
3. How the ban would be enforced.
4. What the penalty would be for violation.
5. A relatively minor consideration that I mention just because it exists, and seems reasonably well accepted, there is the current IOF ban for IOF events (and I think only for those classes under IOF rules at those events). Another thing I will mention -- we are not talking about rogaines here, where a ban seems well accepted.
So, you are king, or queen, or dictator, or whatever you choose to call yourself. What do you do?
Some more considerations --
6. If you are inclined towards the no-ban side, that may be your own preference, but is that best for the federation under all circumstances? Are there events where the ban should exist for some or all classes?
7. If you are inclined towards the ban-them-always side, again, that may be you own preference, but is that best for the federation under all circumstances? Are there events where the ban should not exist for some or all courses?
8. If there is a ban of any sort, how do you enforce it? Do you search people at the start? If not, if you just expect everyone to follow the rule, then that seems to leave things just as open to cheating as no ban at all. And if you search everyone, well, that's quite the image for our sport....
9. Likewise, if there is no ban, do you do anything to deal with cheating that may happen, or may already be happening? Is it just open season for anyone to get away with whatever they want to try?
I ask this question -- what would you actually do if it was just up to you -- because there seem to be a lot of people happy arguing at the edges, and not much consideration of what solutions there might be, and especially how to make them work.
On the one side there is the stick-your-head-in-the-sand attitude that thinks a ban in silly, even though they may acknowledge that there is a time and a place for a ban and that human nature has its bad sides as well as its good sides. On the other side is the rules-rules-just-give-me-more-rules attitude that can't be bothered with matters such as how they will be enforced or how they might negatively affect the sport, even though they may acknowledge that there are times and places where a ban makes no sense.
So is there a middle ground? And is there a sensible way for enforcement?
You can argue all you want, but at some point the responsible parties have to do something, and it would be nice to help them get to a good solution.